Skip to main content

Table 2 The results of pulmonary function test and the number for categorization of lung disease of subjects according to city of residence

From: A cross-sectional study on the pulmonary function of residents in two urban areas with different PM10 concentrations: data from the fourth Korea national health and nutrition examination survey (KNHANES) 2007–2009

Variables

Pulmonary function tests - Mean (Standard error)

Categorization of lung disease - N (%)

FEV1p

FVCp

FEV1/FVC

Normala

Obstructionb

Restrictionc

Total

 Seoul

91.45 (0.61)

92.10 (0.56)

0.80 (0.004)

587 (81.01)

68 (7.41)

94 (11.58)

 Jeju

94.81 (1.74)

95.58 (0.96)

0.82 (0.008)

69 (86.64)

5 (3.51)

7 (9.85)

p value

0.071

0.002

0.167

0.258

Male

 Seoul

90.24 (0.73)

91.26 (0.68)

0.79 (0.005)

236 (76.52)

51 (10.60)

53 (12.88)

 Jeju

97.23 (1.19)

96.37 (1.41)

0.82 (0.005)

34 (94.74)

4 (4.29)

1 (0.97)

p value

< 0.001

0.001

0.001

0.001

Female

 Seoul

92.71 (0.82)

92.97 (0.67)

0.81 (0.004)

351 (85.63)

17 (4.12)

41 (10.25)

 Jeju

92.44 (2.56)

94.81 (1.28)

0.81 (0.013)

35 (78.71)

1 (2.74)

6 (18.54)

p value

0.922

0.208

0.971

0.229

  1. p value were calculated by T-test to compare Seoul with Jeju, or chi-square test to compare categorization of lung disease
  2. FEV1p predicted values of forced expiratory volume in 1 s, FVCp predicted values of forced vital capacity, FEV1/FVC FEV1/FVC ratio
  3. aNormal included subjects who had either an FEV1/FVC ≥0.70 and FVCp ≥80%
  4. bObstruction included subjects with FEV1/FVC < 0.70
  5. cRestriction included subjects who had either an FEV1/FVC ≥0.70 and FVCp < 80%