Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of Right and Left common peroneal nerves conduction study variables between study group and control group

From: Vibration upshot of operating mechanical sewing machine: an insight into common peroneal nerve conduction study

Variables Study group (n = 30) Control group (n = 30) P value
Mean ± SD Mean ± SD
Right PL-CMAP(ms) 11.29 ± 1.25 10.03 ± 1.37 <0.001
DL-CMAP(ms) 3.70 ± 0.58 3.07 ± 0.58 <0.001
Amp(P)-CMAP(mv) 4.57 ± 1.21 6.22 ± 1.72 <0.001
AMP(D)-CMAP(mv) 5.45 ± 1.69 6.91 ± 2.05 0.006
Dist.PDSS(cm) 329.67 ± 19.91 328.33 ± 20.01 0.86
MNCV(m/s) 43.72 ± 3.25 47.49 ± 4.17 <0.001
Left PL-CMAP(ms) 11.28 ± 1.38 10.05 ± 1.37 0.001
DL-CMAP(ms) 3.26 ± 0.40 2.75 ± 0.37 <0.001
Amp(P)-CMAP(mv 4.31 ± 1.55 6.25 ± 1.70 <0.001
AMP(D)-CMAP(mv) 4.83 ± 1.71 6.76 ± 2.10 <0.001
Dist.PDSS(cm) 336.67 ± 24.54 334.0 ± 25.94 0.598
MNCV(m/s) 42.51 ± 3.82 46.76 ± 4.51 <0.001
  1. P ≤ 0.05 = statistically significant
  2. PL-CMAP Proximal latency compound muscle action potential, DL-CMAP Distal latency, Amp(P)-CMAP Amplitude proximal, AMP(D)-CMAP Amplitude distal, Dist.PDSS Distance between proximal and distal stimulating sites, MNCV Motor nerve conduction velocity
\