Vibration upshot of operating mechanical sewing machine: an insight into common peroneal nerve conduction study

Table 3 Comparison of Right and Left common peroneal nerves conduction study variables between study group and control group

Variables		Study group (n = 30)	Control group (n = 30)	P value
Variables		Mean ± SD	Mean ± SD	P value
Right	PL-CMAP(ms)	11.29 ± 1.25	10.03 ± 1.37	<0.001
	DL-CMAP(ms)	3.70 ± 0.58	3.07 ± 0.58	<0.001
	Amp(P)-CMAP(mv)	4.57 ± 1.21	6.22 ± 1.72	<0.001
	AMP(D)-CMAP(mv)	5.45 ± 1.69	6.91 ± 2.05	0.006
	Dist.PDSS(cm)	329.67 ± 19.91	328.33 ± 20.01	0.86
	MNCV(m/s)	43.72 ± 3.25	47.49 ± 4.17	<0.001
Left	PL-CMAP(ms)	11.28 ± 1.38	10.05 ± 1.37	0.001
	DL-CMAP(ms)	3.26 ± 0.40	2.75 ± 0.37	<0.001
	Amp(P)-CMAP(mv	4.31 ± 1.55	6.25 ± 1.70	<0.001
	AMP(D)-CMAP(mv)	4.83 ± 1.71	6.76 ± 2.10	<0.001
	Dist.PDSS(cm)	336.67 ± 24.54	334.0 ± 25.94	0.598
	MNCV(m/s)	42.51 ± 3.82	46.76 ± 4.51	<0.001

P ≤ 0.05 = statistically significant
PL-CMAP Proximal latency compound muscle action potential, DL-CMAP Distal latency, Amp(P)-CMAP Amplitude proximal, AMP(D)-CMAP Amplitude distal, Dist.PDSS Distance between proximal and distal stimulating sites, MNCV Motor nerve conduction velocity

ISSN: 2052-4374