Skip to main content

Table 2 Bernoulli generalized linear model with « at least one sick leave» (SL) as dependent variable according to 1st and 2nd trimester

From: Exposure to occupational hazards for pregnancy and sick leave in pregnant workers: a cross-sectional study

 

1st trimester

2nd trimester

3rd trimester

with & without PR (N = 1257)

strate without PR (N = 939)a

strate with PR (N = 306)a

strate without PR (N = 939)a

strate with PR (N = 306)a

RRab

95% CI

p

RRac

95% CI

p

RRad

95% CI

p

RRah

95% CI

p

RRai

95% CI

p

Number of occupational riskse

 No risk

Ref

 

<0.001

Ref

 

<0.001

Ref

 

<0.001

Ref

 

<0.001

Ref

 

0.25

 1 or 2 risks

1.10

0.78 - 1.54

 

1.96

1.44 - 2.66

 

1.16

0.89 - 1.52

 

1.32

1.12 - 1.54

 

1.12

0.95 - 1.32

 

 3 or 4 risks

1.50

1.06 - 2.12

 

2.05

1.48 - 2.86

 

1.41

1.09 - 1.82

 

1.55

1.32 - 1.82

 

1.15

0.98 - 1.35

 

  ≥ 5 risks

1.84

1.40 - 2.50

 

2.46

1.81 - 3.34

 

1.67

1.34 - 2.08

 

1.57

1.35 - 1.83

 

1.16

1.00 - 1.34

 

Work-family conflictf

 No risk

Ref

 

0.57

Ref

 

<0.001

Ref

 

0.07

Ref

 

0.36

Ref

 

0.50

 1 risks

0.93

0.68 - 1.27

 

1.27

0.98 - 1.61

 

1.13

0.89 - 1.44

 

1.11

0.97 - 1.26

 

1.07

0.92 - 1.24

 

 2 risks

1.00

0.73 - 1.38

 

1.40

1.07 - 1.81

 

1.29

1.02 - 1.64

 

1.09

0.95 - 1.25

 

1.09

0.94 - 1.27

 

  ≥ 3 risks

1.17

0.81 - 1.67

 

1.69

1.29 - 2.22

 

1.14

0.87 - 1.50

 

1.03

0.87 - 1.22

 

1.12

0.96 - 1.31

 

Deprivation (EPICES score ≥ 30)

 No

Ref

 

0.02

Ref

 

0.98

Ref

 

0.17

Ref

 

0.56

Ref

 

0.64

 Yes

1.28

1.04 - 1.60

 

1.00

0.82 - 1.22

 

1.09

0.96 - 1.23

 

0.97

0.87 - 1.08

 

1.02

0.93 - 1.13

 

Home-work commuting felt as difficult

 No

Ref

 

0.27

Ref

 

0.16

Ref

 

0.78

Ref

 

<0.001

Ref

 

0.63

 Yes

1.13

0.99 - 1.60

 

1.13

0.94 - 1.35

 

1.01

0.89 - 1.17

 

1.25

1.14 - 1.37

 

0.97

0.87 - 1.08

 

Age group (years)

  < 25

1.01

0.71 - 1.43

0.65

1.52

1.24 - 1.85

<0.001

1.00

0.81 - 1.25

0.55

1.34

1.17 - 1.54

<0.001

0.89

0.70 - 1.13

0.30

 25- < 30

0.94

0.74 - 1.20

 

1.04

0.87 - 1.24

 

1.01

0.87 - 1.18

 

1.14

1.04 - 1.26

 

1.04

0.93 - 1.16

 

 30- < 35

Ref

  

Ref

  

Ref

  

Ref

  

Ref

  

  ≥ 35

0.83

0.61 - 1.23

 

0.97

0.73 - 1.28

 

0.87

0.71 - 1.07

 

1.02

0.88 - 1.17

 

0.94

0.82 - 1.08

 

Occupational group

 Managers/supervisors

Ref

 

0.34

Ref

 

0.001

Ref

 

0.33

Ref

 

0.006

Ref

 

0.97

 Intermediate occupations

1.11

0.70 - 1.74

 

1.80

1.19 - 2.70

 

1.36

0.90 - 1.96

 

1.30

1.04 - 1.60

 

1.00

0.81 - 1.25

 

 Employees

1.16

0.75 - 1.79

 

1.43

0.96 - 2.16g

 

1.31

0.87 - 1.96g

 

1.16

0.93 - 1.44g

 

1.02

0.85 - 1.22g

 

 Manual workers

1.54

0.89 - 2.65

    

-

-

       

Company size (workers)

  < 10

0.76

0.52 - 1.13

0.55

0.85

0.69 - 1.06

0.38

0.88

0.72 - 1.08

0.55

0.79

0.69 - 0.90

<0.001

0.89

0.78 - 1.02

0.40

 10 - 49

0.82

0.58 - 1.15

 

0.84

0.67 - 1.04

 

0.95

0.82 - 1.11

 

0.82

0.74 - 0.91

 

0.95

0.84 - 1.07

 

 50 - 199

0.82

0.58 - 1.17

 

0.86

0.68 - 1.09

 

0.91

0.77 - 1.08

 

0.87

0.80 - 0.96

 

0.94

0.82 - 1.07

 

  ≥ 200

Ref

  

Ref

  

Ref

  

Ref

  

Ref

  

Type of contract

 Non-fixed term

Ref

 

0.20

Ref

 

0.008

Ref

 

0.56

Ref

 

0.007

Ref

 

0.57

 Fixed-term

1.51

0.80 - 2.85

 

2.06

1.21 - 3.51

 

1.10

0.80 - 1.50

 

1.47

1.11 - 1.94

 

1.10

0.79 - 1.51

 

Pregnancy at risk

 No

Ref

-

<0.001

            

 Yes

2.12

1.72 - 2.63

             

Assisted reproductive therapy

 No

Ref

-

0.001

            

 Yes

1.54

1.19 - 2.00

             
  1. RRa ajusted relative risk, 95% CI 95% confidence intervals, p p-value, PR pregnancy at risk, Ref reference
  2. aPositive interaction between variable pregnancy at risk and variable number of occupational risks at 2nd trimester and at 3rd trimester: presentation according to strate with pregnancy at risk and without pregnancy at risk
  3. bAjusted for: number of occupational risks (0, 1 or 2, 3 or 4, ≥5 risks), deprivation EPICES score ≥ 30 (yes/no), pregnancy at risk (yes/no), assisted reproductive therapy (yes/no)
  4. cAjusted for: number of occupational risks (0, 1 or 2, 3 or 4, ≥5 risks), number of home-work conflicts (0, 1, 2, >2 risks), age group (<25, 25- <30, 30- < 35, ≥ 35 years), occupational group (managers/supervisors, intermediate occupations, employees + manual workers), type of contract (non-fixed term, fixed-term)
  5. dAjusted for: number of occupational risks (0, 1 or 2, 3 or 4, ≥5 risks)
  6. eAmong 17 selected occupational risks in this study
  7. fAmong preschool-age children at home (yes/no), home-work commuting > 50 min/d (yes/no), duration of working hours >8 h/d (yes/no), irregular working hours (yes/no), and absent of two consecutive rest days in a week (yes/no)
  8. gGrouping manual workers and employees because of small number of manual workers
  9. hAjusted for: number of occupational risks (0, 1 or 2, 3 or 4, ≥5 risks), home-work commuting felt as difficult (yes/no), age group (<25, 25- <30, 30- < 35, ≥ 35 years), occupational group (managers/supervisors, intermediate occupations, employees + manual workers), company size (<10, 10–49, 50–199, ≥ 200 workers), type of contract (non-fixed term, fixed-term)
  10. iAjusted for: number of occupational risks (0, 1 or 2, 3 or 4, ≥5 risks), number of home-work conflicts (0, 1, 2, >2 risks)
Back to article page

Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

ISSN: 2052-4374

Contact us