Table 3 Exploratory factor analysis of 13 items of the Organizational Justice Questionnaire
From: Reliability and validity of the Korean version of organizational justice questionnaire
N = 303 | ||
|---|---|---|
Items | Factor 1 | Factor 2 |
Procedural justice | ||
All sides affected by the decision are represented in decision making. (#3) | 0.88 | −0.06 |
Feedback is collected regarding the decision and its implementation. (#6) | 0.75 | 0.06 |
People are provided opportunities to appeal or challenge decisions they find unsuccessful. (#2) | 0.75 | 0.09 |
The concerns of all those affected by the decision are heard before decision making. (#5) | 0.74 | 0.02 |
Decisions are made with consistency (the rules are the same for every employee). (#4) | 0.74 | 0.11 |
Decisions are made based on accurate information. (#1) | 0.65 | 0.13 |
It is possible to requests for clarification or additional information about the decision. (#7) | 0.64 | 0.18 |
Interactional justice | ||
Our supervisor treats us with kindness and consideration. (#4) | −0.06 | 0.94 |
Our supervisor shows concern for our rights as an employee. (#5) | −0.01 | 0.92 |
Our supervisor takes steps to deal with us in a truthful manner. (#6) | 0.12 | 0.77 |
Our supervisor considers our viewpoint. (#1) | 0.09 | 0.75 |
Our supervisor is able to suppress personal biases. (#2) | 0.12 | 0.71 |
Our supervisor provides us with timely feedback about the decisions and their implications. (#3) | 0.17 | 0.67 |
Variance explained (%) | 62.64% | 6.20% |