Skip to main content

Table 3 Exploratory factor analysis of 13 items of the Organizational Justice Questionnaire

From: Reliability and validity of the Korean version of organizational justice questionnaire

   N = 303
Items Factor 1 Factor 2
Procedural justice
 All sides affected by the decision are represented in decision making. (#3) 0.88 −0.06
 Feedback is collected regarding the decision and its implementation. (#6) 0.75 0.06
 People are provided opportunities to appeal or challenge decisions they find unsuccessful. (#2) 0.75 0.09
 The concerns of all those affected by the decision are heard before decision making. (#5) 0.74 0.02
 Decisions are made with consistency (the rules are the same for every employee). (#4) 0.74 0.11
 Decisions are made based on accurate information. (#1) 0.65 0.13
 It is possible to requests for clarification or additional information about the decision. (#7) 0.64 0.18
Interactional justice
 Our supervisor treats us with kindness and consideration. (#4) −0.06 0.94
 Our supervisor shows concern for our rights as an employee. (#5) −0.01 0.92
 Our supervisor takes steps to deal with us in a truthful manner. (#6) 0.12 0.77
 Our supervisor considers our viewpoint. (#1) 0.09 0.75
 Our supervisor is able to suppress personal biases. (#2) 0.12 0.71
 Our supervisor provides us with timely feedback about the decisions and their implications. (#3) 0.17 0.67
Variance explained (%) 62.64% 6.20%
  1. The maximum likelihood method and Promax rotation