Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

Open Access

Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders in Korea Provoked by Workers’ Collective Compensation Claims against Work Intensification

  • Dongmug Kang1,
  • Youngki Kim1Email author,
  • Young-Il Lee1,
  • Sangbaek Koh2,
  • Inah Kim3 and
  • Hoonkoo Lee4
Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine201426:19

https://doi.org/10.1186/2052-4374-26-19

Received: 22 May 2014

Accepted: 26 June 2014

Published: 29 July 2014

Abstract

This article presents the process of workers’ problems with work related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs), the introduction of risk assessments (RA) for their prevention, and the consequences of this process in Korea. In 1997, economic crisis caused a rapid increase of massive layoffs, worker dispatch system introduction, job insecurity, and use of irregular workers resulting in work intensification. Work intensification increased WMSDs, which created massive workers’ compensation collective claims. Workers argued for the reduction of work intensity. The RAs introduced as a consequence of the workers’ struggle is unique in the world. Whereas these RAs were expected to play a pivotal role in WMSDs prevention, they dis not due to workers’ lack of engagement after the compensation struggle. In fact, changes in the compensation judgment system and criteria have resulted in lower compensation approval rates leading to lower workers’ compensation claims. The Korean experience provides insight into WMSDs causes in a globalized world. In such a the globalized world, work intensification as the result of work flexibility could be an international trend.

Keywords

MusculoskeletalNeoliberalismRisk assessmentCompensationWork intensificationStruggleCampaignGlobalization

Introduction

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are about 70% of the among compensated occupational diseases in Korea in recent years [1], and their economic effects have cost 7 billion dollars [2]. Non-accidental WMSDs are relatively new work-related disorders in Korea, that were rarely compensated before the 1990s. Two compensated cases were reported in 1993, and the cases increased up to 345 cases in 1996. The history of research on WMSDs is similar. The first study was published in 1989 with self-reported symptoms among international telephone operators [3], and other studies were published after the mid 1990s [48].

Compensated WMSDs decreased in 1997 to 133 cases, and in 1998 to 72 cases. These decreases might be explained by unstable employment caused by a national economic crisis. After the recovery from the economic crisis in 2000, the numbers surpassed expectation. This explosive expansion of compensated WMSDs was a greater than natural increase. The Korean Confederation of Trade Unions (KCTU) recognized WMSDs cause as a consequence of globalization resulting in work intensification, and organized collective compensation claims. Although this situation shows unique features of socialization of WMSDs problems, there has been no analysis and publication yet.

This paper presents the earlier history of WMSDs, the process of collective compensation claims, and their results.

Review

Beginning of compensated WMSDs in Korea in the 1980s

Although many accidental MSDs had been compensated, there were no recorded compensated non-accidental WMSDs in Korea before the 1980s. The first recorded compensated WMSDs were 20 female wrist ganglion cases at Now Precision Industry, located in Guro, Seoul in 1988 [9]. Then, 6 lumbar disc herniation cases were compensated from Namil Metal, located in Incheon in 1989 [10]. After these 6 cases, an epidemiologic investigation was conducted [11]. This epidemiologic investigation was the first one for WMSDs in Korea. As a result of the investigation, 156 compensated back problems in factories from 1985–1988 were revealed. These factory cases began compensated WMSDs in Korea.

Expansion and collapse of compensated WMSDs in the 1990s

Compensated WMSDs increase from the early 1990s until 1996, and then decreased after 1997 until 1999 (Table 1). Expansion of compensated WMSDs in the early and middle 1990s was partially caused by collective claim applications by labor unions. The labor union of Mando Machine claimed neck-shoulder-arm disorders & back problems as work-related disorders to the Korean Workers’ Compensation and Welfare Service (COMWEL) in 1994. Kia Automobile’s labor union collectively claimed WMSDs. Interestingly, the union argued WMSDs resulted from work process changes due to work intensification. Collective claims from Korea Telecom (KT) with neck-shoulder-arm disorders among telephone operators occurred in 1995 and 1996 with 345 resulting compensated cases in 1996 [12]. As a consequence of KT’s collective claim, “Guidelines for VDT workers” by the Ministry of Labor and Proclamation of MoL 98–15 “Guidelines for repetitive workers” were issued. After 1996, compensated WMSDs had decreased in 1997 to 133 cases, and in 1998 to 72 cases. These decreases might be explained by unstable employment due to a national economic crisis.
Table 1

Compensated work-related musculoskeletal disorders in 1990s[13]

Year

Total compensated work related disorders, n (%)

Compensated work-related musculo-skeletal disorders, n (%)

1993

1,413 (100.0)

2 (0.1)

1994

918 (100.0)

20 (2.2)

1995

1,120 (100.0)

128 (11.4)

1996

1,529 (100.0)

345 (22.6)

1997

1,424 (100.0)

133 (9.3)

1998

1,288 (100.0)

72 (6.6)

Neo-liberalization and work intensification in the late 1990s

Korea experienced an economic crisis from lack of foreign currency in 1997. The Korean government requested urgent fund aid from the International Monetary Fund (IMF). IMF demanded pre-requisite conditions for the aid including legalization of clearance layoffs for the aid. After legalization of clearance layoffs and the labor dispatch system by the National Assembly despite workers’ protests, many companies conducted clearance layoffs, increasing irregular workers. Figure 1 shows irregular workers statistics by MoL and Korea Labour and Society Institute (KLSI) based on the national statistical bureau, KOSTAT. Both lines on the graph present rapid increases of irregular workers after the economic crisis.
Figure 1

The proportion of irregular workers in Korea[14].

These serial situations between the end of 1990s and the beginning of the 2000s can be understood by the introduction of neo-liberalization [15]. Neo-liberalization is defined by free capital movement across the board and globalization of the labor market [16]. This definition could be further specified by deregulation of barrier to profit, disinvestment in welfare states, reduced impact of trade unions, and privatization of the public sectors [17].

Workers’ complaints had increased because of job insecurity caused by usual layoffs, increases of irregular workers, deterioration of working conditions, and the regression of occupational health and safety systems during the economic crisis. Reduction of workers’ numbers because of layoff resulted in work intensification after the recovery from economic crisis. Some of labor unions recognized WMSDs as the result of work intensification. They realized that working hour elongation and work density intensification from the neoliberalism of globalization were causes of WMSDs. This realization resulted in a questionnaire to evaluate work intensification as a result of research conducted at Daewoo shipbuilding [18]. The conceptual framework of work intensifications as causes of WMSDs is shown in Figure 2. Neo-liberalized globalization generally resulted in flexibility in wages, employment types, working hours, working density, and employer-employee relationships, which led to changes in working structures and working conditions because of changes in the labor market [19]. Increases in work flexibility pursue maximization of profit rates by increasing absolute work intensity (elongation of working hours) and relative work intensity (work density intensification). Workers argued WMSDs were due to these work intensifications. Considering Korea was the most flexible of 18 countries, the impacts of neo-liberalization on the musculoskeletal system would be larger than other OECD countries [20]. Many studies using the work intensification questionnaire showed a similar relationship between work intensification and WMSDs to Korea [2123].
Figure 2

Conceptual framework of work intensification by work process change.

Workers’ struggles for WMSDs compensation

Figure 3 shows the compensation statistics of WMSDs after the economic crisis. Given no change of compensation schemes and criteria, there were specific causes of explosive increases in compensation numbers. This explosion might reflect the workers’ massive struggle. KCTU started field surveys in 2000 to evaluate companies’ WMSDs situations for those reasons. Hyundai Precision Industry’s labor union was the first to collectively claimed 64 cases and 50 cases were approved compensation. In 2002, Daewoo Shipbuilding’s labor union conducted research on the social impact of the struggle. As a result of the research, the treatment needs of more than 400 workers were recognized. Collective claims of 87 cases resulted in 76 approved compensation. After this, about 41 labor unions struggled for WMSDs’ compensation (Table 2). The compensation claims rose from all around the nation, especially in industrialized sections (Figure 4). However, there were also claims from non-industrialized portions and non-metal workers, such as the hospital and food sectors.
Figure 3

Statistics of compensated WMSDs and cerebro-cardio-vascular diseases[24].

Table 2

Chronicle of massive workers’ compensation claims for musculoskeletal disorders during 2002–2004 in Korea[25]

Year

Month

Company name

Approval

2000

Oct

Hyundai precision

50

2002

Mar

Daewoo shipbuilding

76

 

Jul

Casco et al. in Kyung-nam area

32

 

Jul

Hallaviston climate control

11

 

Aug

VDO, Kamko et al. in Daejeon and Chung-buk area

10

 

Sep

Hallaviston climate control

5

 

Nov

Daewoo automobile

26

2003

Jan

Samho heavy industry

33

 

Jan

Doowon precision

20

 

Jan

Korea piston ring

7

 

Mar

Daewoo heavy industry and Machinary

27

 

Mar

Open SE, Pulmuone

26

 

Apr

Hyundai automobile

32

 

May

INI steel

29

 

May

Samho shipbuilding

89

 

Jun

14 companies in Chung-nam area

94

 

Jul

9 companies in Pohang area

46

 

Jul

Ssangyongautomobil

109

 

Aug

5 companies in Chung-nam area

49

2004

Feb

Dimos

6

 

Jun

Kyungpook university hospital

32

 

Oct

Rotem

32

Figure 4

Distribution of collective compensation claims. Rounds indicate magnitude of the compensation cases shown in Table 2. Black areas indicate industrial complex.

The major demands of workers were as follows. First, proper treatment and compensation were to be provided thought the entire approval of all claims. Second, work intensity causing WMSDs needed to decrease. Third, WMSDs prevention required legalization. The demands to decrease work intensity included increasing of employees, shortening working hours, reducing of production goals, and improving of working conditions. Successful cases, such as Doowon Precision Co., resulted in increased of employee numbers, decreased of production, improvement of working design, and decreased of work intensity.

Risk assessment for WMSDs as a result of workers’ struggles

The workers’ struggles caused many things. Major outcomes were the recognition of the work- relatedness of musculoskeletal disorders and the possibility of compensation. This expenses workers’ opportunities to be treated. This is an important point in a situation like Korea’s. Because there is no disease pension in Korea, occupational compensation should increase opportunities for treatment. This opportunity increased compensation claims after the workers’ struggles. A second outcome was the introduction of mandatory risk assessment (RA) for WMSDs. This nationwide mandatory RA is focuses on prevention, which is unique in the world. The major contents of this RA is to investigate risk factors and symptom complaints subject, and to report them to the MoL. Because personnel in each company did not have knowledge and skills for the RAs at the beginning of the regulation (year 2004), contracted experts such as ergonomists and/or occupational physicians from outside organizations had usually conducted the RAs. After the regulation has became official, inside personnel conducted the RAs. Meanwhile labor unions of 9 companies in the Changwon area conducted RAs with their own research team composed of field workers under the motto of “field workers are experts who know the real world”. This grassroots research was conducted in other areas such as Pohang, Chung-Nam, Daejeon, and Chung-Buk with research method of participatory action oriented research methods.

Work intensification as a fundamental cause of WMSDs

WMSDs problems in Korea have unique features that has been raised by workers. The work intensity issue argued as a cause of WMSD brought new insight. Although European countries have long histories of workers’ struggles for occupational health and safety, harsh and organized struggle on specific issues by workers in Korea is hard to find in the world [26]. These serial situation after the end of 1990s in Korea could be the result of neo-liberalization. The relationship between neo-liberalization, working condition changes, and health has been reported in researches. Kristensen et al. recognized work intensification by work speed increase and working hour elongation in the globalized labor market, and considered to introduced a measurement tool for work intensification [27]. Helenice reported the occupational injury increases due to 3.7% annual work force reduction with annual production per capita increases during 1991 – 1995 [28]. Kuorinka argued for the necessity of new prevention strategies for WMSDs in a “fast production method” society which could be characterized by flexible production systems resulting in subcontracting, reduction of production cycles, and lean production [29].

After workers struggle

Collective compensation claims by workers during 2002 to 2004 led the MoL to introduce RAs in 2004 despite business opposition. However, the initiative on WMSDs issues begun by workers has turned to government and entrepreneurs. Although some labor unions took advantage of RAs, employers in majority companies have led the process of reducing the effects of work environment on improvement and prevention of WMSDs. The impact of labor unions and workers on the WMSDs issue has decreased during this process. Meanwhile, COMWEL changed the compensation criteria reducing approval rates of compensation, which made it difficult for each worker to apply for compensation claims. Also, large industries have facilitated on-site medical clinics, physiotherapy treatment units, and exercise treatment units to treat WMSDs in factories. They have also provided medical subsidies. All these efforts by companies make workers to avoid compensation claims. In the smaller companies which do not have labor unions, WMSDs complaints might act as a risk factor of job insecurity.

The RAs introduced by workers struggles would have been an important tool for WMSDs prevention, if they had worked properly. This RAs are in danger of being abandoned because of business pressure. Although it is an obligatory legal system, 20.4% and 72.1% of companies with more and less than 50 employees respectively did not take this RAs [30]. Also, companies where RAs were taken seldom improved working conditions, which means this system is just a compliance exercise [31]. This situation might be the consequence of labors focus on compensation and neglect of prevention such as RAs. Also, interest from workers could have as the result of insignificant working condition improvements after RAs. This phenomenon paradoxically shows workers’ roles in successful occupational safety and health systems. WMSDs problems in Korea have been brought to light by the pioneering activity of workers. This very meaningful event in the world suggests macro ergonomic issues as well as micro ergonomic issues as risk factors of WMSDs.

Conclusions

WMSDs problem in Korea had the unique feature of being brought by workers. Furthermore the workers’ argument of work intensification as a cause of WMSDs resulting from work flexibility because of neo-liberalized globalization provides thoughtful insight. Whereas the mandatory RAs for prevention of WMSDs as a result of workers’ protests are unparalleled in the world history, they are in danger of abandonment because of mean effectiveness resulting from worker follow up. This process presents workers’ roles in occupational safety and health areas. In the globalized world, work intensification as a result of work flexibility could be an international trend.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan Hospital
(2)
Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Yonsei University, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital
(3)
Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University
(4)
Korean Institute of Labor Safety and Health

References

  1. Korean Occupational Safety and Health Agency: Analysis of occupational accident and diseases in 2012. 2012.Google Scholar
  2. Oh IH, Yoon SJ, Seo HY, Kim EJ, Kim YA: The economic burden of musculoskeletal disease in Korea: a cross sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011, 12: 1–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Park JI, Cho KH, Lee SH: Cervicobrachial disorders of female international telephone operators : Subjective symptoms. Korean J Occup Environ Med 1989, 1: 141–150.Google Scholar
  4. Park J, Kim YO, Ryu SY, Ha SH, Park BG: A study on the cervicobrachial syndrome among the microwave-oven assemblers – A review on the findings of the examinations. Korean J Occup Environ Med 1995, 7: 320–331.Google Scholar
  5. Choi JW, Yum YT, Song DB, Park JT, Chang SH, Choi JA: Musculoskeletal diseases of upper extremities among the electric assembly workers and telecommunication workers. Korean J Occup Environ Med 1996, 8: 301–319.Google Scholar
  6. Kwon HJ, Ha MN, Yun DR, Cho SH, Kang DH, Ju YS, Paek DM, Paek NJ: Perceived occupational psychosocial stress and work-related musculoskeletal disorders among workers using video display terminals. Korean J Occup Environ Med 1996, 8: 570–577.Google Scholar
  7. Yim SH, Lee YG, Cho JJ, Son JI, Song JC: Symptom prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders and related factors among bank workers by visual display terminal use. Korean J Occup Environ Med 1997, 9: 85–98.Google Scholar
  8. Yoon CS, Lee SH: Symptom prevalence and related factors of upper limb musculoskeletal symptoms in automobile related job workers. Korean J Occup Environ Med 1999, 11: 439–448.Google Scholar
  9. Cho OH: Occupational disease and maternal health. Women Workers’ Campaign 1997.Google Scholar
  10. Cho SA: Major stream and current of compensation struggle for work related musculo-skeletal disorders. Work Health 2003.Google Scholar
  11. Outbreak of 37 back problem in one company. Hangeoreo Newspaper. 1989. July 15 [http://newslibrary.naver.com/viewer/index.nhn?articleId=1989071500289108001&edtNo=4&printCount=1&publishDate=1989–07–15&officeId=00028&pageNo=8&printNo=362&publishType=00010]
  12. Kim MH, Kim HJ: An untold story in labor health: Korean women workers. New Solut 2007, 17: 325–343. 10.2190/NS.17.4.hView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ministry of Employment and Labor: Statistics of Occupational Accidents and Diseases. In Annual Report of Occupational Accidents. Seoul; 1999.Google Scholar
  14. Kim YS: Size and Conditions of Irregular Workers. Seoul: Korea Labor and Society Institute; 2014.Google Scholar
  15. Crotty J, Lee KK: Korea’s neoliberal restructuring: Miracle or Disaster? Rev Radic Polit Econ 2002, 26: 667–678.Google Scholar
  16. Thorsen DE, Lie A: What is Neoliberalism? 2010.Google Scholar
  17. Kotz DM: Globalization and neoliberalism. Rethink Marx 2002, 12: 64–79.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Kang DM: The Relationship between Musculoskeletal Disease and Work Intensity among Shipyard Workers. In PhDThesis. Busan, South Korea: Kosin University, College Graduate School, Medical Department; 2003.Google Scholar
  19. Spiegel JM, Labonte R, Ostry AS: Understanding “Globalization” as a determinants: A critical perspective. Int J Occup Environ Health 2004, 10: 360–367. 10.1179/oeh.2004.10.4.360View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Restrepo JE, Tokman A: Labor markets and institutions: an overview. Cent Bank Chile 2005. Available: [cited 10 May 2014] http://www.bcentral.cl/estudios/documentos-trabajo/pdf/dtbc304.pdfGoogle Scholar
  21. Kim YK, Kang DM, Koh SB, Son BC, Kim JW, Kim DW, Kim KH, Han SH: Risk factors of work-related musculoskeletal symptoms among motor engine assembly plant workers. Korean J Occup Environ Med 2004, 16: 488–498.Google Scholar
  22. Kim IA, Koh SB, Kim JS, Kang DM, Son MA, Kim YK, Song JC: The relationship between musculoskeletal symptoms and Job stress & intensity of labor among shipbuilding workers. Korean J Occup Environ Med 2004, 16: 401–412.Google Scholar
  23. Lee YK, Im SH: Association between changed working conditions and musculoskeletal disorders among automobile. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg 2006, 16: 276–283.Google Scholar
  24. Ministry of Employment and Labor: Statistics of Occupational Accidents and Diseases. In Annual Report of Occupational Accidents. Seoul; 2013.Google Scholar
  25. Korean Confederation of Trade Unions: History of Workers’ Struggle for Musculoskeletal Disorders. Seoul; 2005.Google Scholar
  26. Elling RH: Struggle for Worker’s Health: a Study of six Industrialized Countries. New York: BAYWOD PUB Co; 1986.Google Scholar
  27. Kristensen TS, Bjorner JB, Kristensen KB, Borg V: The distinction between work pace and working hours in the measurement of quantitative demands at work. Work Stress 2004, 18: 305–322. 10.1080/02678370412331314005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Helenice JC: The effects of production changes on the musculoskeletal disorders in Brazil and South America. Int J Ind Ergo 1999, 25: 103–104.Google Scholar
  29. Kuorinka K: The influence of industrial trends on work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs). Int J Ind Ergo 1998, 21: 5–9. 10.1016/S0169-8141(97)00020-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Seo SC, Choi JW, Kim CH, Shin EK, Kim HS, Cho YM, Lee SK, Kim KH: Study for Effect Analysis of Musculoskeletal Disorders Prevention Program. Seoul: Ministry of Employment and Labor Research Report; 2011.Google Scholar
  31. The Korean Society of Safety: Study on the Implementation of Risk Assessments for Musculoskeletal Disorders. Seoul: Ministry of Employment and Labor Research Report; 2007.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Kang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement