Skip to content


Open Access

Relationship between residence characteristics and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure in housewives: second Korean National Environmental Health Survey (2012–2014)

Annals of Occupational and Environmental MedicineThe official journal of the Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Medicine201830:23

Received: 21 September 2017

Accepted: 6 April 2018

Published: 18 April 2018



Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) produced by incomplete combustion have negative effects on human health due to their carcinogenicity and teratogenicity. Indoor sources of PAHs include tobacco smoke, heating sources, and cooking. This study evaluated the relationship between human PAH exposure and residence characteristics.


This study was based on the second Korean National Environmental Health Survey (2012–2014). Non-smoking housewives were included in the analyses (n = 1269). The concentrations of urinary PAH metabolites (2-naphthol, 2-hydroxyfluorene, 1-hydroxyphenanthrene, and 1-hydroxypyrene) were adjusted by urine creatinine level. The geometric mean concentrations of urinary PAH metabolites by residential factors were examined. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations between residential variables and PAH exposures.


The adjusted geometric mean concentrations of urinary 2-hydroxyfluorene and 1-hydroxyphenanthrene were significantly higher in the group residing within 100 m of a major road (p < 0.05) than in those residing > 100 m from a major road. In logistic regression analyses, the odds ratio (OR) for exceeding the third quartile of urinary 1-hydroxypyrene concentration was significantly higher in the group using coal or wood fuel for residential heating than in the group using gas (OR = 2.745, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.295–5.819). The detached house group had a significantly higher OR for 1-hydroxyphenanthrene compared with the apartment group (OR = 1.515, 95% CI = 1.023–2.243).


Our study shows the evidence of associations between some urinary PAH metabolite levels (1-hydroxyphenanthrene and 1-hydroxypyrene) and residence characteristics. Additional studies are needed to clarify these associations.


PAHsHousewivesResidence characteristicsHeating fuel


Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are ubiquitous environmental pollutants containing two or more fused aromatic rings. PAHs are produced by the incomplete combustion of various organic materials, including coal, oil, gas, and wood. Major emission sources of PAHs include vehicle exhaust, industrial activity, power generation, waste incineration, and residential heating [1]. Tobacco smoke, heating systems, cooking, and infiltration of outdoor pollutants contribute to indoor PAH levels [2].

Before the 2000s, most studies of PAH exposure focused on occupational exposure such as in coke oven workers, aluminum smelter workers, and road pavers [3]. Subsequently, however, related research has focused on low-level environmental PAH exposure. Owing to difficulties in exposure source identification and the demand for integrated data on human exposure through multiple routes, including inhalation, ingestion, and dermal contact, biomonitoring using urine has allowed the assessment of non-occupational PAH exposure.

There are more than 100 PAHs. The United States Environmental Protection Agency lists 16 typical PAHs as priority compounds due to health concerns [4]. Among them, the following seven PAHs are classified as probable carcinogens: benzo(a)anthracene, chrysene, benzo(b)fluoranthene, benzo(k)fluoranthene, benzo(a)pyrene, indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene, and dibenzo(a,h)anthracene [5]. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) also categorizes benzo(a)pyrene, the most highly carcinogenic of these compounds, as group 1 (carcinogenic to humans). It is particularly associated with lung, bladder, and skin cancers [6]. Also, several other PAHs are classified as probably or possibly carcinogenic to humans (IARC groups 2A and 2B, respectively) [7]. In addition to their carcinogenicity, other adverse health effects, including the development of cardiovascular [8, 9] and respiratory [10, 11] diseases, may be associated with chronic PAH exposure. Moreover, epidemiological studies suggest that prenatal exposure to PAHs can cause birth defects [12, 13] and impaired neurodevelopment [14, 15].

Indoor air quality exerts a considerable impact on human health. Indeed, indoor PAH levels in air or dust are related to residence characteristics, including age and type [1618]. However, the PAH concentration in air or dust may not directly reflect personal exposure. Few studies have investigated indoor PAH exposure using urinary PAH metabolite levels. In this study, we evaluated the relationship between residential factors and PAH exposure by determining the levels of PAH metabolites in urine.


Study participants

In this study, we used data from the second Korean National Environmental Health Survey (KNEHS), which was conducted by the National Institute of Environmental Research from 2012 to 2014; the survey involved stratified sampling of the national population and the 2010 housing census. The survey comprised 6478 participants from 400 districts who were selected based on the population distribution. Data were collected by means of person-to-person interviews and biological sampling. We selected 1760 subjects identified as housewives, aged > 19 years, and non-smokers. Subjects who had outlier PAH metabolite concentrations (n = 53) and who did not respond to the relevant questions (n = 438) were excluded. Finally, 1269 subjects were included in the analysis.


Age, body mass index (BMI), second-hand smoking, alcohol drinking, and exercise were included as variables in this study. Regarding residence characteristics, type of heating fuel, type of residence, age of building, and distance from a major road were analyzed. Type of heating fuel was categorized into the following four groups: ‘gas,’ ‘oil,’ ‘coal/briquette/wood,’ and ‘electric fuel/cogeneration.’ Type of residence was divided into the following three groups: ‘apartment,’ ‘multiplex,’ and ‘detached house.’ Age of building and occupancy years were categorized as ≤10, 10–20, 20–30, and > 30 years. Distance of residence from a major road was categorized into less and more than 100 m.

Urinary PAH metabolite levels

Four PAH metabolites were analyzed: 2-naphthol (naphthalene), 2-hydroxyfluorene (fluorene), 1-hydroxyphenanthrene (phenanthrene), and 1-hydroxypyrene (pyrene). Urinary PAH metabolite concentrations were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The metabolites were hydrolyzed by ß-glucuronidase/aryl sulfatase followed by derivatization with bistrimethylsilyl trifluoroacetamide. Concentrations were calculated from calibration curves drawn by the standard addition method. The limit of detection (LOD) was 0.050 μg/L for 2-naphthol, and 0.040 μg/L for 2-hydroxyfluorene, 0.047 μg/L for 1-hydroxyphenanthrene, 0.015 μg/L for 1-hydroxypyrene. For internal quality control purposes, the target coefficient of the calibration curve was ≥0.995. Measurements below the LOD were replaced with the LOD divided by the square root of 2. All urinary PAH metabolite concentrations were adjusted to the urine creatinine concentration.

Statistical analysis

Geometric means and 95% confidence intervals of urinary PAH metabolite levels (2-naphthol, 2-hydroxyfluorene, 1-hydroxyphenanthrene, and 1-hydroxypyrene) were calculated according to demographic characteristics. Because the distributions showed positive skewness, all metabolite concentrations were natural-log transformed before use in the analyses. Univariate comparisons according to residential parameters and demographic characteristics were performed by Student’s t-test and an analysis of variance. An analysis of covariance was used for comparisons of variables adjusted for age and passive smoking. The adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for exceeding the upper quartile of the concentration of each urinary PAH metabolite were calculated by multiple logistic regression analyses. SPSS (version 22 for Microsoft Windows; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) was used in all statistical analyses.


Table 1 shows the demographic characteristics and geometric mean urinary concentrations of PAH metabolites. The concentrations of all four urinary PAH metabolites differed significantly among the age groups. The urinary concentration of 1-hydroxyphenanthrene and 1-hydroxypyrene was significantly higher in the obese group than the other body weight groups. The non-alcohol-drinking group had a significantly higher urinary concentration of 2-naphthol than the alcohol-drinking group. Urinary 2-naphthol and 1-hydroxyphenanthrene concentrations were significantly higher in the non-exercise group. The geometric mean with 95% confidence intervals, median, 10th, 25th, 75th, and 90th percentile concentrations of each urinary PAH metabolite are listed in Table 2.
Table 1

Demographic distributions and geometric mean concentration of urinary PAH metabolites with 95% confidence intervals in μg/g creatinine


N (%)

2-Naphthol GM (95% CI)

2-Hydroxyfluorene GM (95% CI)

1-Hydroxyphenanthrene GM (95% CI)

1-Hydroxypyrene GM (95% CI)


 20–29 yrs

30 (2.4)

2.10 (1.47–3.02)

0.23 (0.18–0.29)

0.10 (0.08–0.13)

0.18 (0.14–0.23)

 30–39 yrs

229 (18.0)

2.02 (1.77–2.30)

0.26 (0.24–0.28)

0.10 (0.10–0.11)

0.16 (0.14–0.17)

 40–49 yrs

208 (16.4)

2.09 (1.82–2.40)

0.25 (0.23–0.28)

0.11 (0.10–0.12)

0.17 (0.16–0.19)

 50–59 yrs

284 (22.4)

2.82 (2.51–3.17)

0.31 (0.28–0.33)

0.15 (0.14–0.16)

0.21 (0.19–0.22)

 60–69 yrs

313 (24.7)

2.97 (2.66–3.32)

0.30 (0.27–0.32)

0.15 (0.14–0.16)

0.22 (0.21–0.24)

  ≥ 70 yrs

205 (16.2)

3.39 (2.95–3.89)

0.30 (0.27–0.33)

0.16 (0.14–0.17)

0.22 (0.20–0.24)



< 0.001


< 0.001

< 0.001


  < 25 kg/m2

780 (61.5)

2.56 (2.38–2.75)

0.27 (0.26–0.29)

0.13 (0.12–0.13)

0.19 (0.18–0.20)

  ≥ 25 kg/m2

489 (38.5)

2.72 (2.48–2.98)

0.29 (0.28–0.31)

0.15 (0.14–0.16)

0.21 (0.20–0.22)





< 0.001


Passive smoking


1111 (87.5)

2.63 (2.47–2.79)

0.28 (0.27–0.29)

0.14 (0.13–0.14)

0.20 (0.19–0.20)


158 (12.5)

2.55 (2.17–3.00)

0.29 (0.26–0.32)

0.12 (0.11–0.14)

0.18 (0.16–0.20)









753 (59.3)

2.75 (2.55–2.96)

0.28 (0.27–0.30)

0.14 (0.13–0.14)

0.19 (0.19–0.20)


516 (40.7)

2.44 (2.23–2.67)

0.28 (0.27–0.30)

0.13 (0.12–0.14)

0.20 (0.18–0.21)









596 (47.0)

2.43 (2.23–2.64)

0.27 (0.26–0.29)

0.12 (0.12–0.13)

0.19 (0.18–0.20)


673 (53.0)

2.80 (2.60–3.03)

0.29 (0.27–0.30)

0.14 (0.14–0.15)

0.20 (0.19–0.21)





< 0.001


Table 2

Geometric mean with 95% confidence intervals and selected percentile concentrations of urinary PAH metabolite (μg/g creatinine)

PAH metabolite

GM (95% CI)

10th percentile

25th percentile


75th percentile

90th percentile


2.62 (2.48–2.77)







0.28 (0.27–0.29)







0.13 (0.13–0.14)







0.19 (0.19–0.20)






Table 3 presents the geometric mean and 95% confidence intervals of urinary PAH metabolite concentrations according to residence characteristics adjusted for age and passive smoking. The concentrations of 2-hydroxyfluorene and 1-hydroxyphenanthrene were significantly higher in the group with a residence < 100 m from a major road (p < 0.05).
Table 3

Adjusted geometric mean concentrations (μg/g creatinine) of urinary PAH metabolites with 95% confidence intervals in μg/g creatinine categorized by residence characteristics


N (%)

2-Naphthol GM* (95% CI)

2-Hydroxyfluorene GM* (95% CI)

1-Hydroxyphenanthrene GM* (95% CI)

1-Hydroxypyrene GM* (95% CI)

Type of heating fuel


1014 (79.9)

2.54 (2.31–2.80)

0.29 (0.27–0.31)

0.13 (0.12–0.14)

0.19 (0.17–0.20)


145 (11.4)

3.18 (2.53–4.00)

0.27 (0.23–0.31)

0.13 (0.11–0.14)

0.20 (0.17–0.23)


36 (2.8)

1.82 (1.07–3.08)

0.32 (0.22–0.45)

0.17 (0.12–0.24)

0.30 (0.21–0.42)

 Electric fuel/cogeneration

74 (5.8)

3.15 (2.25–4.41)

0.27 (0.21–0.33)

0.15 (0.12–0.18)

0.19 (0.15–0.24)







Type of residence


741 (58.4)

2.56 (2.29–2.86)

0.28 (0.26–0.31)

0.13 (0.12–0.14)

0.19 (0.17–0.20)


170 (13.4)

2.65 (2.10–3.36)

0.29 (0.25–0.34)

0.13 (0.11–0.14)

0.18 (0.15–0.21)


358 (28.2)

2.73 (2.34–3.20)

0.28 (0.26–0.32)

0.14 (0.13–0.16)

0.20 (0.18–0.23)







Age of building

  ≤ 10 yrs

155 (12.2)

2.72 (2.18–3.39)

0.29 (0.25–0.33)

0.14 (0.12–0.16)

0.18 (0.16–0.21)

 10–19 yrs

382 (30.1)

2.85 (2.43–3.36)

0.29 (0.26–0.33)

0.13 (0.12–0.15)

0.18 (0.16–0.20)

 20–29 yrs

465 (36.6)

2.40 (2.09–2.74)

0.27 (0.25–0.30)

0.13 (0.12–0.14)

0.19 (0.17–0.21)

  > 30 yrs

267 (21.0)

2.67 (2.20–3.24)

0.29 (0.26–0.33)

0.13 (0.12–0.15)

0.21 (0.19–0.24)







Distance from major road

  ≥ 100 m

594 (46.8)

2.57 (2.27–2.91)

0.27 (0.25–0.29)

0.12 (0.11–0.13)

0.18 (0.17–0.20)

  < 100 m

675 (53.2)

2.68 (2.38–3.00)

0.30 (0.28–0.33)

0.14 (0.13–0.15)

0.20 (0.18–0.22)







*Estimated geometric means and p-values were calculated by ANCOVA adjusting for age and passive smoking

The results of logistic regression analyses adjusted by age and passive smoking are shown in Table 4. The coal/briquette/wood fuel group had a significantly higher OR for 1-hydroxypyrene compared with the gas group (OR = 2.745, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.295–5.819). The OR for 1-hydroxyphenanthrene was significantly higher in the detached house group than in the apartment group (OR = 1.515, 95% CI = 1.023–2.243).
Table 4

Adjusted odds ratios for exceeding the third quartile of each urinary PAH metabolite by residence characteristics


2-Naphthol ORa (95% CI)

2-Hydroxyfluorene ORa (95% CI)

1-Hydroxyphenanthrene ORa (95% CI)

1-Hydroxypyrene ORa (95% CI)

Type of heating fuel







1.515 (0.979–2.343)

0.865 (0.543–1.378)

0.734 (0.458–1.175)

1.145 (0.721–1.820)


0.668 (0.289–1.543)

1.504 (0.707–3.200)

1.136 (0.530–2.435)

2.745 (1.295–5.819)

 Electric fuel/cogeneration

0.962 (0.530–1.745)

0.465 (0.228–0.946)

0.918 (0.507–1.660)

0.884 (0.469–1.668)

Type of residence







1.250 (0.840–1.862)

1.447 (0.984–2.128)

1.439 (0.967–2.142)

1.203 (0.808–1.793)


1.290 (0.872–1.908)

1.206 (0.809–1.796)

1.515 (1.023–2.243)

0.997 (0.664–1.497)

Age of building

  ≤ 10 yrs





 10–19 yrs

1.213 (0.748–1.968)

0.942 (0.590–1.505)

0.912 (0.563–1.477)

1.329 (0.807–2.189)

 20–29 yrs

1.029 (0.637–1.662)

1.039 (0.657–1.642)

0.996 (0.623–1.594)

1.247 (0.762–2.043)

  > 30 yrs

1.517 (0.901–2.553)

1.485 (0.895–2.465)

1.139 (0.679–1.913)

1.631 (0.951–2.798)

Distance from major road

  ≥ 100 m





  < 100 m

1.108 (0.848–1.447)

1.270 (0.971–1.660)

1.213 (0.925–1.590)

0.965 (0.737–1.264)

aAdjusted by age, passive smoking


In this study, we assessed the relationship between residence characteristics and PAH exposure. PAH metabolite concentrations differed significantly according to distance from a major road, and were associated with using solid fuel and living in a detached house.

When comparing with national survey data of the United States and Canada among female population, the concentrations ranges of the urinary 2-hydroxyfluorene and 1-hydroxyphenanthrene in our study population were similar with the results of these countries [19, 20]. But our results showed higher urinary concentration of 1-hydroxypyrene and lower concentration of 2-naphthol than these countries’ results. Lower urinary concentration of 2-naphthol in our study seems to be a reflection of non-smoking population because urinary concentration of naphthalene metabolites is more sensitive to smoking status than other PAH metabolites [21].

Physical properties of PAHs vary according to its ring number, that is, molecular weight. Some researchers have evaluated that the ambient concentration of indoor low-molecular-weight PAHs (containing 2–3 rings) are mainly higher than outdoor and affected by residence characteristics and indoor activities in non-smoker home [18, 22]. Another study identified that mothballs and some building materials significantly contributed to indoor naphthalene concentrations [23]. On the other hands, outdoor sources such as traffic combustion usually emitted high-molecular-weight PAHs (containing 4 or more rings) [22, 24]. Several studies showed that there were reasonably strong correlations between indoor and outdoor concentrations in high-molecular-weight PAHs [18, 22]. Outdoor air may influence on the concentration of indoor high-molecular-weight PAHs.

Several studies have assessed air PAH concentrations by type of heating fuel. In one such study, air PAH concentrations in residences with wood-burning heating appliances were high due to intrusion of outdoor air or leakage from the appliance [25]. In our study, the OR of 1-hydroxypyrene was significantly higher in residences with coal/briquette/wood heating systems. Solid fuels, including wood and coal, reportedly emit higher levels of PAHs and other pollutants than gas fuels such as liquid petroleum gas and natural gas [26]. Also, solid fuel heating system may be more prone to leakage due to deterioration. Indeed, replacement with improved stoves reportedly reduces PAH exposure [27, 28].

The OR for 1-hydroxyphenanthrene in the detached house group was significantly higher than that in the apartment group. The PAH concentrations in outdoor air are reportedly higher on lower floors [16]. Thus, the high OR in the detached house group may be due to the smaller number of floors compared to apartments. Secondly, the concentrations of semi-volatile organic compounds (e.g., PAHs and nicotine) are high in old buildings [29, 30], possibly due to dust accumulation in carpets or adsorption onto household surfaces such as painted wallboards. However, urinary PAH metabolite levels did not differ according to building age in this study.

Road traffic is the dominant contributor to indoor PAH levels in urban areas [31]. Distance from a major road is related to influx of outdoor pollutants. Indeed, air PAH concentrations are significantly higher within 1 km of a main road and expressway [22]. In our study, the adjusted concentrations of 2-hydroxyfluorene and 1-hydroxyphenanthrene were significantly higher in the group whose residences were < 100 m from a major road. However, there was no significant difference in the concentration of 1-hydroxypyrene (the highest-molecular-weight PAH analyzed in this study) according to distance from a major road.

The main strength of the present study is the analysis of a large dataset from a standardized population. Furthermore, most previous experimental and epidemiological studies used PAH concentrations in air or dust, which hampered the evaluation of direct human exposure. Biologic monitoring using urinary metabolites provides a more direct measure of the internal body load. Semi-volatile PAHs with 4–5 rings are typically present in both the gas and particulate phases [21]; Whereas the use of air or dust PAH concentrations allows only one route of exposure to be evaluated, biomonitoring provides an integrated measure of exposure through inhalation, ingestion, and dermal absorption.

Our research has several limitations. First, the KNEHS lacks information about sampling season and behavioral habits. Ambient concentrations of PAHs may have variations among seasons. The concentration of high-molecular-weight PAHs become elevated in winter due to domestic heating [22] and low-temperature combustion [32]. For low-molecular-weight PAHs, indoor concentration is significantly higher in summer because of increased PAH vaporization with increasing temperature [18]. Also, PAHs can be affected by indoor-outdoor air ventilation which is more common in the spring and fall. On the other hand, frequent dust cleaning is negatively associated with indoor PAH concentrations [33]. Cooking habit and the use of mothballs and incense may also influence indoor pollutant levels [34]. However, the KNEHS lacks data on sampling seasons and lifestyle factors such as cleaning frequency. Thus, our results should be interpreted with caution. Second, the effect of indoor smoking cannot be completely excluded. Although non-smokers were analyzed in this study and passive smoking was included as a covariate to exclude any effect of smoking, household surfaces contaminated by indoor smoking can affect indoor PAH exposure; this effect is termed third-hand smoke. Third, because of the small number of coal/briquette/wood fuel group (N = 37), our result should be interpreted with caution. It could be possible that a small sample size leads to a false positive result. Future studies with larger samples are needed for more reliable result.

The health risks of PAHs have been recognized as a public concern. Because people spend a lot of time in their residences, indoor environment can contribute to daily exposure to PAHs. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the residential factors that can affect indoor PAHs exposure. In this regard, our study, which used dataset from large population, will provide the reference for future study and the evidence for developing policy of improving indoor air quality.


This study investigated the relationship between residence characteristics and PAH exposure using urinary biomarkers. There was an evidence of association between the 1-hydroxypyrene level and fuel type used in the heating system. Moreover, the urinary 1-hydroxyphenanthrene level was associated with building type. Future studies should evaluate the influence of heating fuel and take into consideration the seasonality of fuel use. Also, the influence of lifestyle factors (e.g., cleaning frequency) on indoor PAH levels should be assessed.



Body mass index


Confidence interval


Korean National Environmental Health Survey


National Institute of Environmental Research


Odds ratio


Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon



This study used data from the Second Korean National Environmental Health Survey (2012-2014), which was conducted by National Institute of Environmental Research. The Authors gratefully acknowledge their effort.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available on request at the National Institute of Environmental Research, Environmental Health Research Department,

Authors’ contributions

HGP, DHK and JYR performed the statistical analyses and drafted the article. NYH and CKL searched and assisted the related references. JHK and KHK supported and advised medical view. All of the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Haeundae Paik Hospital (IRB No. 2017–07-616).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, South Korea
Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Institute of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University, Busan, South Korea


  1. Maliszewska-Kordybach B. Sources, concentrations, fate and effects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the environment. Part a: PAHs in air. Pol J Environ Stud. 1999;8:131–6.Google Scholar
  2. Boström C-E, Gerde P, Hanberg A, Jernström B, Johansson C, Kyrklund T, Rannug A, Törnqvist M, Victorin K, Westerholm R. Cancer risk assessment, indicators, and guidelines for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the ambient air. Environ Health Perspect. 2002;110:451–88.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Levin JO, Rhén M, Sikström E. Occupational PAH exposure: urinary 1-hydroxypyrene levels of coke oven workers, aluminium smelter pot-room workers, road pavers, and occupationally non-exposed persons in Sweden. Sci Total Environ. 1995;163:169–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. USEPA. Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment. Washington, DC: U.S Government Printing Office; 1986.Google Scholar
  5. USEPA: Polcyclic organic matter (POM). Accessed Sept 2016.
  6. Boffetta P, Jourenkova N, Gustavsson P. Cancer risk from occupational and environmental exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Cancer Causes Control. 1997;8:444–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. IARC. Some non-heterocyclic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and some related exposures. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2010;92:36-37.Google Scholar
  8. Brook RD, Franklin B, Cascio W, Hong Y, Howard G, Lipsett M, Luepker R, Mittleman M, Samet J, Smith SC, Jr., Tager I. A statement for healthcare professionals from expert panel on population and prevention science of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2004;109:2655-71.Google Scholar
  9. Xu X, Cook RL, Ilacqua VA, Kan H, Talbott EO, Kearney G. Studying associations between urinary metabolites of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and cardiovascular diseases in the United States. Sci Total Environ. 2010;408:4943–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Miller RL, Garfinkel R, Horton M, Camann D, Perera FP, Whyatt RM, Kinney PL. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, environmental tobacco smoke, and respiratory symptoms in an inner-city birth cohort. Chest. 2004;126:1071–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Rosa MJ, Jung KH, Perzanowski MS, Kelvin EA, Darling KW, Camann DE, Chillrud SN, Whyatt RM, Kinney PL, Perera FP, Miller RL. Prenatal exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, environmental tobacco smoke and asthma. Respir Med. 2011;105:869–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Choi H, Rauh V, Garfinkel R, Tu Y, Perera FP. Prenatal exposure to airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and risk of intrauterine growth restriction. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116:658–65.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Pope DP, Mishra V, Thompson L, Siddiqui AR, Rehfuess EA, Weber M, Bruce NG. Risk of low birth weight and stillbirth associated with indoor air pollution from solid fuel use in developing countries. Epidemiol Rev. 2010;32:70–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Perera FP, Li Z, Whyatt R, Hoepner L, Wang S, Camann D, Rauh V. Prenatal airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure and child IQ at age 5 years. Pediatrics. 2009;124:e195–202.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Perera FP, Rauh V, Whyatt RM, Tsai W-Y, Tang D, Diaz D, Hoepner L, Barr D, Tu Y-H, Camann D, Kinney P. Effect of prenatal exposure to airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on neurodevelopment in the first 3 years of life among Inner-City children. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:1287–92.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Jung KH, Bernabé K, Moors K, Yan B, Chillrud SN, Whyatt R, Camann D, Kinney PL, Perera FP, Miller RL. Effects of floor level and building type on residential levels of outdoor and indoor polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, black carbon, and particulate matter in new York City. Atmosphere. 2011;2:96.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Whitehead T, Metayer C, Gunier RB, Ward MH, Nishioka MG, Buffler P, Rappaport SM. Determinants of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon levels in house dust. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2011;21:123–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Li A, Schoonover TM, Zou Q, Norlock F, Conroy LM, Scheff PA, Wadden RA. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in residential air of ten Chicago area homes: concentrations and influencing factors. Atmos Environ. 2005;39:3491–501.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. CDC: (2017) Fourth National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals, Updated Tables, January 2017. Accessed March 2018.
  20. HealthCanada: (2013) Second Report on Human Biomonitoring of Environmental Chemicals in Canada. Accessed March 2018.
  21. Castro D, Slezakova K, Delerue-Matos C, MdC A-F, Morais S, MdC P. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in gas and particulate phases of indoor environments influenced by tobacco smoke: levels, phase distributions, and health risks. Atmos Environ. 2011;45:1799–808.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Ohura T, Amagai T, Fusaya M, Matsushita H. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in indoor and outdoor environments and factors affecting their concentrations. Environ Sci Technol. 2004;38:77–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kang DH, Choi DH, Won D, Yang W, Schleibinger H, David J. Household materials as emission sources of naphthalene in Canadian homes and their contribution to indoor air. Atmos Environ. 2012;50:79–87.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Li Z, Mulholland JA, Romanoff LC, Pittman EN, Trinidad DA, Lewin MD, Sjodin A. Assessment of non-occupational exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons through personal air sampling and urinary biomonitoring. J Environ Monit. 2010;12:1110–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Gustafson P, Ostman C, Sallsten G. Indoor levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in homes with or without wood burning for heating. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42:5074–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Shen G. Quantification of emission reduction potentials of primary air pollutants from residential solid fuel combustion by adopting cleaner fuels in China. J Environ Sci. 2015;37:1–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Li Z, Sjödin A, Romanoff LC, Horton K, Fitzgerald CL, Eppler A, Aguilar-Villalobos M, Naeher LP. Evaluation of exposure reduction to indoor air pollution in stove intervention projects in Peru by urinary biomonitoring of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon metabolites. Environ Int. 2011;37:1157–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Riojas-Rodriguez H, Schilmann A, Marron-Mares AT, Masera O, Li Z, Romanoff L, Sjodin A, Rojas-Bracho L, Needham LL, Romieu I. Impact of the improved patsari biomass stove on urinary polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon biomarkers and carbon monoxide exposures in rural Mexican women. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119:1301–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Van Loy MD, Nazaroff WW, Daisey JM. Nicotine as a marker for environmental tobacco smoke: implications of sorption on indoor surface materials. J Air Waste Manage Assoc. 1998;48:959–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Whitehead TP, Metayer C, Petreas M, Does M, Buffler PA, Rappaport SM. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in residential dust: sources of variability. Environ Health Perspect. 2013;121:543–50.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Castro D, Slezakova K, Delerue-Matos C, MdCM A-F, Morais S, MdC P. Contribution of traffic and tobacco smoke in the distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on outdoor and indoor PM2. 5. Global Nest Journal. 2010;12:3–11.Google Scholar
  32. Freeman DJ, Cattell FCR. Woodburning as a source of atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Environ Sci Technol. 1990;24:1581–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Maertens RM, Yang X, Zhu J, Gagne RW, Douglas GR, White PA. Mutagenic and carcinogenic hazards of settled house dust. I: polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon content and excess lifetime cancer risk from preschool exposure. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42:1747–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lung SCC, Kao MC, Hu SC. Contribution of incense burning to indoor PM10 and particle-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons under two ventilation conditions. Indoor Air. 2003;13:194–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s). 2018